Re: sync process names between ps and pg_stat_activity

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: sync process names between ps and pg_stat_activity
Date: 2017-08-31 20:33:31
Message-ID: 32577.1504211611@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> As an aside, is there a reason why the archiver process is not included
> in pg_stat_activity?

It's not connected to shared memory.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-08-31 20:43:00 static assertions in C++
Previous Message David Steele 2017-08-31 20:11:18 Re: Update low-level backup documentation to match actual behavior