| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | dmigowski(at)ikoffice(dot)de, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #10823: Better REINDEX syntax. |
| Date: | 2014-07-30 17:29:31 |
| Message-ID: | 32524.1406741371@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> On Tue, Jul 1, 2014 at 10:33:07AM +0000, dmigowski(at)ikoffice(dot)de wrote:
>> Compared to CLUSTER and VACUUM FULL we need to specify a database to the
>> REINDEX command. Why? It would be logical to reindex the current database,
>> exactly like CLUSTER does. So why isn't the DATABASE parameter optional?
> Wow, yeah, that is kind of odd, e.g.
I don't find it all that odd. We should not be encouraging routine
database-wide reindexes.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-07-30 17:35:55 | Re: BUG #10823: Better REINDEX syntax. |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-07-30 16:07:50 | Re: BUG #10823: Better REINDEX syntax. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-07-30 17:35:55 | Re: BUG #10823: Better REINDEX syntax. |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-07-30 17:27:24 | commitfest status |