From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> |
Cc: | Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql-server: Rearrange pg_subtrans handling |
Date: | 2004-08-24 14:31:13 |
Message-ID: | 3252.1093357873@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com> writes:
> ... Don't forget having to deal with a backend dying without being able to
> decrement the count (not my idea, Bruce (iirc) mentioned it last time
> this was discussed). I think at the least you'd need a
> max-trans-id-with-lock number stored next to the count so that in the
> event of backend crashes the lock will eventually be released.
No, because the whole table would simply be flushed upon backend crash.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-24 20:41:41 | pgsql-server: Allow second and subsequent names in a qualified (dotted) |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-08-24 14:09:32 | Re: pgsql-server: Update that 8.0 will support MS Win |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-08-24 14:35:34 | Re: 8.0 beta 1 on linux-mipsel R5900 |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-08-24 14:09:32 | Re: pgsql-server: Update that 8.0 will support MS Win |