Re: Preprocessor condition fix

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Preprocessor condition fix
Date: 2016-04-12 14:53:58
Message-ID: 32494.1460472838@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Christian Ullrich <chris(at)chrullrich(dot)net> writes:
> * Tom Lane wrote:
>> Oh? Then we should not need that one (the /D switch in win32.mak) at all.
>> Should we just remove it?

> We have both confirmed several times that nothing depends on it. I think it can go.

Done.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2016-04-12 15:15:21 Re: Some other things about contrib/bloom and generic_xlog.c
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-04-12 14:42:11 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Allow Pin/UnpinBuffer to operate in a lockfree manner.