Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints
Date: 2023-04-07 22:26:28
Message-ID: 3248613.1680906388@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2023-04-07 17:46:33 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> After quickly eyeing the diffs, I'm just going to take the new output
>> as good. I'm not surprised that there are additional output messages
>> given the additional catalog entries this made. I *am* a bit surprised
>> that some messages seem to have disappeared --- are there places where
>> this resulted in fewer catalog accesses than before? Nonetheless,
>> there's no good reason to assume this test is exposing any bugs.

> I wonder if the issue is that the new paths miss a hook invocation.

Perhaps. I'm content to silence the buildfarm for today; we can
investigate more closely later.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2023-04-07 22:29:45 Re: Commitfest 2023-03 starting tomorrow!
Previous Message Andres Freund 2023-04-07 22:23:26 Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints