Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> writes:
> On 11/4/16 4:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> My proposal therefore is for SPI_fnumber to ignore (not match to)
>> dropped columns, and to remove any caller-side attisdropped tests that
>> thereby become redundant.
> Yeah, SPI users certainly shouldn't need to worry about attisdropped,
> and exposing attnum doesn't seem like a good idea either.
OK, I pushed a patch to centralize this in SPI_fnumber.
regards, tom lane