From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Subject: | Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
Date: | 2006-09-02 15:28:58 |
Message-ID: | 3246.1157210938@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Here's a completely novel idea: accept incremental patches.
I don't think it's as novel as all that --- personally I've always
preferred to tackle large projects incrementally.
> I've been bitten by having stuff rejected because there was no immediate
> use for them;
Maybe you failed to make the larger picture clear. If you'd gotten the
pghackers list to agree to some plan like "I want to accomplish X, and
to get there I want to do A then B then C", I doubt we'd have rejected a
subsequent patch to do A (assuming it doesn't break anything else, of
course).
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Theo Schlossnagle | 2006-09-02 15:41:48 | Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2006-09-02 15:20:46 | Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Theo Schlossnagle | 2006-09-02 15:41:48 | Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta |
Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2006-09-02 15:20:46 | Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project |