Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Date: 2006-09-02 15:28:58
Message-ID: 3246.1157210938@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Here's a completely novel idea: accept incremental patches.

I don't think it's as novel as all that --- personally I've always
preferred to tackle large projects incrementally.

> I've been bitten by having stuff rejected because there was no immediate
> use for them;

Maybe you failed to make the larger picture clear. If you'd gotten the
pghackers list to agree to some plan like "I want to accomplish X, and
to get there I want to do A then B then C", I doubt we'd have rejected a
subsequent patch to do A (assuming it doesn't break anything else, of
course).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Theo Schlossnagle 2006-09-02 15:41:48 Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2006-09-02 15:20:46 Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Theo Schlossnagle 2006-09-02 15:41:48 Re: Getting a move on for 8.2 beta
Previous Message Greg Sabino Mullane 2006-09-02 15:20:46 Postgres tracking - the pgtrack project