Re: Foreign keys and partitioned tables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Foreign keys and partitioned tables
Date: 2018-04-04 18:04:10
Message-ID: 32347.1522865050@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Thanks, pushed.

This has broken the selinux regression tests, evidently because it
removed ONLY from the emitted FK test queries. While we could change
the expected results, I would first like to hear a defense of why that
change is a good idea. It seems highly likely to be the wrong thing
for non-partitioned cases.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2018-04-04 18:08:20 Re: Add support for printing/reading MergeAction nodes
Previous Message Tomas Vondra 2018-04-04 18:03:42 Re: some last patches breaks plan cache