Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC

From: Jim Nasby <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
To: Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>
Cc: "PFC" <lists(at)peufeu(dot)com>, "Christopher Browne" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Date: 2006-06-22 20:31:13
Message-ID: 322E84DA-29E4-47FA-905F-19E7C16D58AC@pervasive.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Jun 22, 2006, at 2:00 PM, Mark Woodward wrote:

> I actually have a good number of years of experience in this topic,
> and
> memcached or file system files are NOT the best solutions for a server
> farm.

What's wrong with memcached for session data?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Sr. Engineering Consultant jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com
Pervasive Software http://pervasive.com work: 512-231-6117
vcard: http://jim.nasby.net/pervasive.vcf cell: 512-569-9461

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Woodward 2006-06-22 20:36:34 Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2006-06-22 20:28:34 Re: vacuum, performance, and MVCC