From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Bump soft open file limit (RLIMIT_NOFILE) to hard limit on startup |
Date: | 2025-02-11 22:55:39 |
Message-ID: | 3226911.1739314539@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> In the current version of the AIO patchset, the creation of those io_uring
> instances does happen as part of an shmem init callback, as the io uring
> creation also sets up queues visible in shmem.
Hmm.
> So the issue would actually be that we're currently doing set_max_safe_fds()
> too late, not too early :/
Well, we'd rather set_max_safe_fds happen after semaphore creation,
so that it doesn't have to be explicitly aware of whether semaphores
consume FDs. Could we have it be aware of how many FDs *will be*
needed for io_uring, but postpone creation of those until after we
jack up RLIMIT_NOFILE?
I guess the other way would be to have two rounds of RLIMIT_NOFILE
adjustment, before and after shmem creation. That seems ugly but
shouldn't be very time-consuming.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Nathan Bossart | 2025-02-11 22:55:56 | Re: describe special values in GUC descriptions more consistently |
Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2025-02-11 22:48:38 | Re: Bump soft open file limit (RLIMIT_NOFILE) to hard limit on startup |