Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com> writes:
> notice the for in select, it's for sure wrong, but it raises no errors
> until I execute the function
> also note the declaration for row, there is no record56 type, but it
> raises no errors at create.
It's *syntax* checking, not an exhaustive check that the function is OK.
regards, tom lane