Re: pg_extension_config_dump() with a sequence

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Moshe Jacobson <moshe(at)neadwerx(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_extension_config_dump() with a sequence
Date: 2013-08-28 02:50:06
Message-ID: 32049.1377658206@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Moshe Jacobson <moshe(at)neadwerx(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Well, I think you did it wrong, or else you're using a PG version that
>> predates some necessary fix, because it works for me.

> Sorry for the delayed response. I am using postgres 9.1.4 with pg_dump of
> the same version.

Ah. I think that you are missing this 9.1.7 fix:

commit 5110a96992e508b220a7a6ab303b0501c4237b4a
Author: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Date: Fri Oct 26 12:12:53 2012 -0400

In pg_dump, dump SEQUENCE SET items in the data not pre-data section.

Represent a sequence's current value as a separate TableDataInfo dumpable
object, so that it can be dumped within the data section of the archive
rather than in pre-data. This fixes an undesirable inconsistency between
the meanings of "--data-only" and "--section=data", and also fixes dumping
of sequences that are marked as extension configuration tables, as per a
report from Marko Kreen back in July. The main cost is that we do one more
SQL query per sequence, but that's probably not very meaningful in most
databases.

Back-patch to 9.1, since it has the extension configuration issue even
though not the --section switch.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jayadevan 2013-08-28 03:50:24 Re: OLAP
Previous Message 高健 2013-08-28 01:54:55 Re: What is the relationship between checkpoint and wal