From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: scaling beyond 4 processors |
Date: | 2004-12-07 04:17:24 |
Message-ID: | 31kp6jF3ad57bU5@individual.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
The perhaps odd thing is that just about any alternative to quad-Xeon
is likely to be _way_ better. There are some context switching
problems that lead to it being remarkably poorer than you'd expect.
Throw in less-than ideal performance of the PAE memory addressing
system and it seems oddly crippled overall.
We've been getting pretty good results with IBM pSeries systems;
they're expensive, but definitely very fast.
Preliminary results with Opterons are also looking very promising.
One process seemed about 25x as fast on a 4-way 8GB Opteron as it was
on a 4-way 8GB Xeon, albeit with enough differences to make the
comparison dangerous.
--
wm(X,Y):-write(X),write('@'),write(Y). wm('cbbrowne','gmail.com').
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/sgml.html
The IETF motto: "Rough consensus *and* working code."
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-07 04:44:36 | Re: TableSpace Design issues on Postgres 8.0 beta 5 |
Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2004-12-07 04:16:01 | Re: scaling beyond 4 processors |