Re: Setting min/max TLS protocol in clientside libpq

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, cary huang <hcary328(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: Setting min/max TLS protocol in clientside libpq
Date: 2020-01-06 14:37:54
Message-ID: 31993.1578321474@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> Not having thought about it in much detail, but it's a fairly common
> scenario to have a much newer version of libpq (and the platform it's
> built on) than the server. E.g. a v12 libpq against a v9.6 postgres
> server is very common. For example, debian based systems will
> auto-upgrade your libpq, but not your server (for obvious reasons).
> And it's also quite common to upgrade platforms for the application
> much more frequently than the database server platform.

Yeah, there's a reason why we expect pg_dump and psql to function with
ancient server versions. We shouldn't break this scenario with
careless rejiggering of libpq's connection defaults.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-01-06 15:15:19 Re: pgsql: Add basic TAP tests for psql's tab-completion logic.
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2020-01-06 13:59:14 Re: Setting min/max TLS protocol in clientside libpq