Re: Going, going, GUCs!

From: Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Going, going, GUCs!
Date: 2009-10-20 18:55:23
Message-ID: 318D60BBDB18C37E51126909@[172.26.14.62]
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

--On 20. Oktober 2009 10:49:33 -0700 David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:

> track_activities (should be on)
> track_counts (should be on)
> update_process_title (should be on)

Removing all track* GUCs would only make sense if we are going to make
autovacuum mandatory, i think. And i thought update_process_title was
introduced due to performance complaints on some platforms which can't
easily be resolved?

--
Thanks

Bernd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bill Moran 2009-10-20 18:58:30 Re: Going, going, GUCs!
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-10-20 18:53:10 Re: Going, going, GUCs!