From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Bierman <bierman(at)apple(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: darwin pgsql patches |
Date: | 2000-12-01 15:49:01 |
Message-ID: | 3189.975685741@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
Peter Bierman <bierman(at)apple(dot)com> writes:
> In other news, I just (litterally a minute ago) fixed the last issues
> with my port (hurray!), and the regression test passes every test
> except geometry, where the diffs differ in the 15th decimal digit for
> the last coordinate pair. Rounding error somewhere?
Do the results match either of the existing expected-files for powerpc
systems?
> Do the regression tests adequately stress semaphores? Are semephores
> used interprocess? Do the regression tests cause this sort of use to
> be tested?
The parallel format ("make check") provides at least some confidence.
The regress tests don't really exercise IPC very thoroughly though :-(
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-12-02 17:30:54 | Re: darwin pgsql patches |
Previous Message | Peter Bierman | 2000-12-01 08:51:09 | Re: darwin pgsql patches |