Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Susanne Ebrecht <susanne(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele(dot)bartolini(at)2ndquadrant(dot)it>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations
Date: 2011-04-04 18:42:07
Message-ID: 3186.1301942527@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Even if that doesn't turn out to be the case, this is pretty harmless,
> so maybe we should just apply it and move on.

I have no great objection to the patch as such; just wondering what the
roadmap is.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-04-04 18:48:49 Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-04-04 17:28:47 Re: [HACKERS] Uppercase SGML entity declarations

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-04-04 18:43:25 Re: time table for beta1
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-04-04 18:41:08 Re: GUC assign hooks (was Re: wal_buffers = -1 and SIGHUP)