| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Idea for improving buildfarm robustness |
| Date: | 2015-10-04 00:35:54 |
| Message-ID: | 31825.1443918954@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> On 10/02/2015 09:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I wrote:
>>> Here's a rewritten patch that looks at postmaster.pid instead of
>>> pg_control. It should be effectively the same as the prior patch in terms
>>> of response to directory-removal cases, and it should also catch many
>>> overwrite cases.
>> BTW, my thought at the moment is to wait till after next week's releases
>> to push this in. I think it's probably solid, but it doesn't seem like
>> it's worth taking the risk of pushing shortly before a wrap date.
>>
>> If anyone wants to argue for including it in the releases, speak up ...
> Wait, we're backpatching this?
Of course. It's not going to do much for buildfarm stability if it's
only in HEAD.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-10-04 02:35:51 | Draft release notes are up for review |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-10-03 22:16:42 | Re: creating extension including dependencies |