From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> |
Cc: | Дмитрий Иванов <firstdismay(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pg_dump insert column GENERATED |
Date: | 2021-11-20 17:33:04 |
Message-ID: | 3177295.1637429584@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com> writes:
> On 11/20/21 04:27, Дмитрий Иванов wrote:
>> Why does pg_dump generate an insertion script in the generated columns?
> Actually I think it should be DEFAULT.
It should be, and it is when I try this example. I get output like
--
-- Data for Name: object; Type: TABLE DATA; Schema: bpd; Owner: postgres
--
INSERT INTO bpd.object (id, id_class, id_position, bquantity, id_position_root, id_conception, barcode_unit, id_unit_conversion_rule, "timestamp", on_freeze, timestamp_class, name, id_class_root, id_group, id_group_root, id_object_carrier, "desc", id_class_prop_object_carrier, id_pos_temp_prop, is_inside, mc) VALUES (51253, 1015, 461, 1, 461, 84, 2020000512530, 14, '2021-11-14 08:40:31.381', false, '2021-02-19 11:01:28.402', 'NFC метка самоклеющаяся', 1013, 138, 138, -1, '', -1, -1, DEFAULT, 1);
I wonder what version of pg_dump is actually being used there.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Дмитрий Иванов | 2021-11-20 18:25:11 | Re: pg_dump insert column GENERATED |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2021-11-20 17:01:56 | Re: insert column monetary type ver 2 |