From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Why conf.d should be default, and auto.conf and recovery.conf should be in it |
Date: | 2014-01-16 18:46:00 |
Message-ID: | 31712.1389897960@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Another point here is that hard-wiring a config directory location
>> into the executables completely breaks many scenarios for running
>> multiple clusters with the same executables.
> Therefore the proposal is not to hardwire the location in the
> executables.
At least some people seem to be advocating that, even if I misunderstood
whether you were.
I'm fine if the proposal is that postgresql.conf include "include_dir
conf.d" by default (where that's read as relative to postgresql.conf's own
directory). Even better if it's not terribly difficult for a packager to
change that, because I think some will want to. We could possibly reduce
the need for packagers to change it if we made it be
"include_dir postgresql.d", because conf.d is a damn generic name for
something that might be in the same /etc directory as configs for other
packages.
regards, tom lane
PS: off topic, but isn't ParseConfigDirectory leaking the result
of AbsoluteConfigLocation? In both normal and error paths?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2014-01-16 18:50:38 | Re: Why conf.d should be default, and auto.conf and recovery.conf should be in it |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-01-16 18:38:32 | Re: [PATCH] Negative Transition Aggregate Functions (WIP) |