| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster |
| Date: | 2017-02-20 14:10:11 |
| Message-ID: | 31709.1487599811@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> It's definitely not hard, we already have
> IntegerTimestampToTimestampTz() which does the opposite conversion anyway.
It's not the functions that are hard, it's making sure that you have used
them in the correct places, and declared relevant variables with the
appropriate types. Evidence on the ground is that that is very hard;
I have little faith that we'll get it right without compiler support.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2017-02-20 14:12:39 | [PATCH] Suppress Clang 3.9 warnings |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-02-20 14:07:33 | Re: Replication vs. float timestamps is a disaster |