From: | NMB Webmaster <webmaster(at)nmb(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Different runtime on the same query |
Date: | 2004-06-15 08:06:41 |
Message-ID: | 3170138796webmaster@nmb.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
The first thing I made was vacuum/analyze them. Then I deleted and rebuilt the indicies but the problem remained. So I created a new table (e_catalogo2) with new indicies, I copied all data from the old table to the new one, weirdly the problem was solved. In my opinion there is something wrong (sometimes) in building indicies in Postgres, but of course, I am not sure.
I wish to update to the last stable version but I fear the passing will be painful, when I updated from the 7.0 to 7.2 I had to modify some data structure because not compliant with the new version.
On 14/06/2004 20.58, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>NMB Webmaster <webmaster(at)nmb(dot)it> writes:
>> I have two database quite similar, one has more tables than the
>other.
>
>Are both of them vacuumed/analyzed recently? The slow plan seems
>to be
>estimating many more rows out of the e/m join than the other one.
>
>> My Postgres version is 7.2.3. Please help me , it is very important
>to
>> me to tune this query.
>
>I'd recommend an update, myself. 7.2.3 is old...
>
> regards, tom lane
>
>---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
>TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that
>your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>
>
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Frank van Vugt | 2004-06-15 11:29:31 | Why is a union of two null-results automatically casted to type text ? |
Previous Message | Neeraj | 2004-06-15 06:03:40 | Interpreting OSDB Results |