From: | Petr Jelinek <petr(dot)jelinek(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: snapbuild woes |
Date: | 2017-05-05 11:53:16 |
Message-ID: | 316d270d-d97e-65ba-dcdd-34f6b13698f6@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/05/17 02:42, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2017-05-04 17:00:04 -0700, Andres Freund wrote:
>> Attached is a prototype patch for that.
>
I am not sure I understand the ABI comment for started_collection_at.
What's the ABI issue? The struct is private to snapbuild.c module. Or
you want to store it in the ondisk snapshot as well?
About better name for it what about something like oldest_full_xact?
Otherwise the logic seems to be right on first read, will ponder it a
bit more
--
Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Petr Jelinek | 2017-05-05 12:00:50 | Re: compiler warning with VS 2017 |
Previous Message | Neha Khatri | 2017-05-05 11:42:47 | Re: Duplicate usage of tablespace location? |