| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, "osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com" <osumi(dot)takamichi(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Alexey Lesovsky <lesovsky(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Greg Nancarrow <gregn4422(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Skipping logical replication transactions on subscriber side |
| Date: | 2021-09-30 20:05:35 |
| Message-ID: | 3163a085-66e6-426c-f97b-8df66980c7c4@enterprisedb.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 30.09.21 07:45, Masahiko Sawada wrote:
> I've attached updated patches that incorporate all comments I got so
> far. Please review them.
I'm uneasy about the way the xids-to-be-skipped are presented as
subscriptions options, similar to settings such as "binary". I see how
that is convenient, but it's not really the same thing, in how you use
it, is it? Even if we share some details internally, I feel that there
should be a separate syntax somehow.
Also, what happens when you forget to reset the xid after it has passed?
Will it get skipped again after wraparound?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2021-09-30 20:09:56 | Re: 002_types.pl fails on some timezones on windows |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2021-09-30 20:04:34 | Re: prevent immature WAL streaming |