Re: Odd Shortcut behaviour in PG14

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Zahir Lalani <ZahirLalani(at)oliver(dot)agency>, "pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Odd Shortcut behaviour in PG14
Date: 2023-11-23 18:39:09
Message-ID: 3163408.1700764749@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"David G. Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thursday, November 23, 2023, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> This question is unanswerable as given. You have not even defined
>> what you mean by "fail" (error? wrong query result?), let alone
>> provided enough detail for someone else to reproduce the problem.

> The OP complains about the apparent inconsistent optimizing away of the SRF
> function call of crypto_secretbox_open in the lateral when the join
> predicate is known to be false.

Hmm, your crystal ball apparently works better than mine today,
because I sure do not see where that information was presented.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David G. Johnston 2023-11-23 18:40:38 Re: Odd Shortcut behaviour in PG14
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2023-11-23 18:30:57 Odd Shortcut behaviour in PG14