| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
| Date: | 2014-02-04 22:47:27 |
| Message-ID: | 31632.1391554047@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 02/04/2014 03:08 PM, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> Having an AMI would help, but even with an AMI in place, MinGW is
>> still insanely slow. Running "make" on already made PostgreSQL (so
>> there was nothing to actually do) takes 1.5 minutes. And a make after
>> a "make clean" takes half an hour. This is on an actual desktop, not
>> an AWS micro instance. So doing a git bisect is just painful. Is the
>> MSVC build faster?
> Would have to check with the same build options (cassert and debug have
> major timing effects.) I agree it's not lightning fast like "make -j 4"
> on a decent linux box.
I wonder if ccache exists for Mingw. That thing makes a huge difference
in the perceived build speed ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2014-02-04 22:55:26 | Re: Re: Misaligned BufferDescriptors causing major performance problems on AMD |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-02-04 22:45:30 | Re: Wait free LW_SHARED acquisition |