From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move each SLRU's lwlocks to a separate tranche. |
Date: | 2016-03-25 13:48:43 |
Message-ID: | 31588.1458913723@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> It's stupid that we keep spending time and energy figuring out which
> shared memory data structures require alignment and which ones don't.
> Let's just align them *all* and be done with it. The memory cost
> shouldn't be more than a few kB.
I think such a proposal should come with a measurement, not just
speculation about what it costs.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2016-03-25 14:11:38 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move each SLRU's lwlocks to a separate tranche. |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-25 13:48:00 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move each SLRU's lwlocks to a separate tranche. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Michael Paquier | 2016-03-25 13:48:49 | Re: Proposal: "Causal reads" mode for load balancing reads without stale data |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-03-25 13:48:00 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Move each SLRU's lwlocks to a separate tranche. |