Re: PL/Python fails on new NetBSD/PPC 8.0 install

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Benjamin Scherrey <scherrey(at)proteus-tech(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PL/Python fails on new NetBSD/PPC 8.0 install
Date: 2019-10-30 17:33:00
Message-ID: 31546.1572456780@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

I wrote:
> Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> From a quick look at the relevant trees, isn't the problem here that
>> cpython thinks it can reserve pthread_t value -1 (or rather, that
>> number cast to unsigned long, which is the type it uses for its own
>> thread IDs):

> Yeah, this. I shall now go rant at the Python people about that.

Done at

https://bugs.python.org/issue38646

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2019-10-30 17:39:04 Re: Parallel leader process info in EXPLAIN
Previous Message Andres Freund 2019-10-30 17:27:02 Re: Proposal: Global Index