Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question)

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>
Cc: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>, Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org>, Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question)
Date: 2006-01-27 16:47:32
Message-ID: 3153.1138380452@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> My question was at a higher level, actually: *what* should we be
>> counting?

> Oh, I see. Do you think small incremental improvements to the stat
> system will buy us much? I think we should be thinking big here, i.e.
> rewrite most stuff instead.

Uh, I wasn't aware of any proposals for a major rewrite. What did you
have in mind?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2006-01-27 17:00:44 Re: TSearch2 / German compound words / UTF-8
Previous Message Uwe C. Schroeder 2006-01-27 16:42:06 Re: Allowing Custom Fields

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-01-27 17:27:16 Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question)
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2006-01-27 16:27:10 Re: stats for failed transactions (was Re: [GENERAL] VACUUM Question)