Re: BlockNumber initialized to InvalidBuffer?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
Cc: Teodor Sigaev <teodor(at)sigaev(dot)ru>, Oleg Bartunov <oleg(at)sai(dot)msu(dot)su>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BlockNumber initialized to InvalidBuffer?
Date: 2012-07-13 15:38:19
Message-ID: 3152.1342193899@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Markus Wanner <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> writes:
> On 07/13/2012 11:33 AM, Markus Wanner wrote:
>> As another minor improvement, it doesn't seem necessary to repeatedly
>> set the rootBlkno.

> Sorry, my mail program delivered an older version of the patch, which
> didn't reflect that change. Here's what I intended to send.

Applied to HEAD with a little bit of further tweaking.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ronan Dunklau 2012-07-13 16:04:08 Query planning, nested loops and FDW.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-07-13 14:52:43 Re: Synchronous Standalone Master Redoux