From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: lazy detoasting |
Date: | 2018-05-01 14:04:38 |
Message-ID: | 313e030c-392b-53cd-1546-522bb7cb9f57@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 4/25/18 07:50, Andrew Gierth wrote:
> do $$
> declare a text;
> begin
> select f1.a into a from f1;
> delete from f1;
> commit;
> perform pg_sleep(10); -- vacuum f1 in another session while it sleeps
> call p1(a);
> end; $$;
> INFO: a: (t,t,f,"missing chunk number 0",,)
>
> (p1 in this case is using toast_item_detail() from the module I just put
> up at https://github.com/RhodiumToad/pg-toastutils to examine the value)
Is there a more self-contained way to test this? I have been trying
with something like
create table test1 (a int, b text);
insert into test1 values (1, repeat('foo', 2000));
do $$
declare
x text;
begin
select test1.b into x from test1;
delete from test1;
commit;
perform pg_sleep(10); -- vacuum test1 in another session
raise notice 'x = %', x; -- should fail
end;
$$;
But it doesn't fail.
--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2018-05-01 15:31:50 | Re: "could not reattach to shared memory" on buildfarm member dory |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2018-05-01 12:10:00 | Re: Is there a memory leak in commit 8561e48? |