Re: xml

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Ramesh T <rameshparnanditech(at)gmail(dot)com>, Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: xml
Date: 2015-03-23 14:09:43
Message-ID: 31335.1427119783@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> result of xmlagg is not valid xml.

Really? Either that's a bug, or it's declared wrong.

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Re: xml at 2015-03-23 12:30:44 from Pavel Stehule

Responses

  • Re: xml at 2015-03-23 14:42:05 from Pavel Stehule

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Igor Stassiy 2015-03-23 14:16:06 Difference between light-weight geometry types
Previous Message Scott Ribe 2015-03-23 13:59:17 scope quirk in copy in function