| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Multiple setup steps for isolation tests |
| Date: | 2012-09-04 03:21:41 |
| Message-ID: | 3133.1346728901@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>> The grammar changes look wrong: I think you eliminated the ability
>> to have zero setup steps, no? Instead, setup_list should expand to
>> either empty or "setup_list setup".
> I tried that first, but had shift/reduce conflicts.
[ scratches head ... ] Dunno what you did exactly, but the attached
version works fine for me.
regards, tom lane
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| isolation-setuplist-v3.patch | text/x-patch | 4.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-09-04 03:36:21 | Re: index-only scans versus serializable transactions |
| Previous Message | Amit Kapila | 2012-09-04 03:11:23 | Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol |