Re: Replace uses of deprecated Python module distutils.sysconfig

Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> Also, considering the failure on prairiedog, I do see now on
> <https://docs.python.org/3/library/sysconfig.html> that the sysconfig
> module is "New in version 3.2". I had interpreted the fact that it
> exists in version 2.7 that that includes all higher versions, but
> obviously there were multiple branches involved, so that was a mistaken
> assumption.

Hm. I installed 3.1 because we claim support for that. I don't mind
updating to 3.2 (as long as we adjust the docs to match), but it seems
kinda moot unless you figure out a solution for the include-path
issue. I see that platforms as recent as Debian 10 are failing,
so I don't think we can dismiss that as not needing fixing.

regards, tom lane