Re: use GUC for cmdline

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: use GUC for cmdline
Date: 2001-06-22 13:18:55
Message-ID: 3129.993215935@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-patches

Marko Kreen <marko(at)l-t(dot)ee> writes:
> secure_ctx changes too. it will be PGC_BACKEND after '-p'.

Oh, okay, I missed that part. Could we see the total state of the
patch --- ie, a diff against current CVS, not a bunch of deltas?
I've gotten confused about what's in and what's out.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Cramer 2001-06-22 13:19:05 RE: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]
Previous Message Karel Zak 2001-06-22 12:01:27 Re: nocreatetable for 7.1.2 [patch]