| From: | Michael Glaesemann <grzm(at)seespotcode(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql feature thought |
| Date: | 2006-05-16 04:59:55 |
| Message-ID: | 311955BD-C433-4DEE-91B4-4A816B7DF158@seespotcode.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On May 16, 2006, at 13:42 , Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>>> What if single line statements that were seperated by ; within
>>> psql were implicitly within a transaction?
>> Seems like this would risk breaking a lot of scripts.
>
> I wouldn't assume that it would be a default feature of course.
> Perhaps something that can be passed from the command line or from
> a .psqlrc ?
What use case are you envisioning? Just saving ... *counts ... 14
keystrokes in this case? (I'm not saying there *isn't* a use case. I
just don't see a big benefit here.)
Michael Glaesemann
grzm seespotcode net
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-05-16 05:17:32 | Re: psql feature thought |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-05-16 04:42:18 | Re: psql feature thought |