Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg
Date: 2023-05-19 13:42:00
Message-ID: 31186.1684503720@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org> writes:
> I would also prefer a GUC named gss_accept_delegation, but the current
> name matches the libpq gssdeleg connection parameter and the PGSSDELEG
> environment variable. Maybe there's something to be said for keeping
> those three things alike?

+1 for spelling it out in all user-visible names. I do not think
that that GSS-API C symbol is a good precedent to follow.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2023-05-19 13:44:36 Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg
Previous Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2023-05-19 13:35:19 Re: Naming of gss_accept_deleg