Fwd: Multiple disks: RAID 5 or PG Cluster

Ok, I will hate that day, but it's only 6 months

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Vivek Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
> Date: Fri 17 Jun 2005 23:26:43 CEST
> To: Yves Vindevogel <yves(dot)vindevogel(at)implements(dot)be>
> Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Multiple disks: RAID 5 or PG Cluster
>
>
> On Jun 17, 2005, at 5:24 PM, Yves Vindevogel wrote:
>
>> That means that only 2 / 5 of my discs are actual storage. That's a
>> bit low, imho.
>>
>> Maybe I can ask my question again:
>> Would I go for RAID 5, RAID 0 or PG clustering
>>
>> On 17 Jun 2005, at 22:21, Vivek Khera wrote:
> If you're allergic to RAID10, then do RAID5.  but you'll sacrifice
> performance.  You'll hate life the day you blow a disk and have to
> rebuild everything, even if it is all easily restored.
>
>
>
>
Met vriendelijke groeten,
Bien à vous,
Kind regards,

Yves Vindevogel
Implements