Re: Images in the official documentation

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Westermann <daniel(dot)westermann(at)dbi-services(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-docs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Images in the official documentation
Date: 2018-02-24 01:04:26
Message-ID: 30d7e365-cd3b-aae0-a8ac-7b880f26413d@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

On 2/23/18 11:21, Tom Lane wrote:
> In the distant
> past, as I recall, we had a GIF or two; but we abandoned that on the
> grounds that it was unmaintainable and also incompatible with some
> documentation output formats. I'm not too sure what the state of
> play is on the latter point, now that we've switched to XML.

The complications with the image formats in the past were mainly around
what ((pdf)jade)tex would accept. The tools have shifted a bit now, and
the zoo formats is a different one. Nothing that a few make rules
couldn't address, though, I think.

The issue of how to manage the sources is still the same, though.

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2018-02-24 15:59:54 Basic security
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2018-02-24 00:56:35 improve man pages build speed