Re: Fast COPY FROM based on batch insert

From: Andrey Lepikhov <a(dot)lepikhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: Etsuro Fujita <etsuro(dot)fujita(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, Zhihong Yu <zyu(at)yugabyte(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, tanghy(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(dot)oss(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com
Subject: Re: Fast COPY FROM based on batch insert
Date: 2022-08-23 05:58:22
Message-ID: 30b35bf3-6bfc-c52c-cccf-aec3d5f6e76d@postgrespro.ru
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 22/8/2022 11:44, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> I think the latter is more consistent with the existing error context
> information when in CopyMultiInsertBufferFlush(). Actually, I thought
> this too, and I think this would be useful when the COPY FROM command
> is executed on a foreign table. My concern, however, is the case when
> the command is executed on a partitioned table containing foreign
> partitions; in that case the input data would not always be sorted in
> the partition order, so the range for an error-occurring foreign
> partition might contain many lines with rows from other partitions,
> which I think makes the range information less useful. Maybe I'm too
> worried about that, though.
I got your point. Indeed, perharps such info doesn't really needed to be
included into the core, at least for now.

--
regards,
Andrey Lepikhov
Postgres Professional

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2022-08-23 06:03:03 Re: [PATCH] Optimize json_lex_string by batching character copying
Previous Message Julien Rouhaud 2022-08-23 05:56:11 Re: Schema variables - new implementation for Postgres 15