Re: [PATCH] CF app: add "Returned: Needs more interest"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CF app: add "Returned: Needs more interest"
Date: 2022-08-03 18:53:23
Message-ID: 3096850.1659552803@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> My impression is that a lot of the patches floating from CF to CF have gotten
> sceptical feedback and at best a minor amount of work to address that has been
> done.

That I think is a distinct issue: nobody wants to take on the
unpleasant job of saying "no, we don't want this" in a final way.
We may raise some objections but actually rejecting a patch is hard.
So it tends to slide forward until the author gives up.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jacob Champion 2022-08-03 19:06:03 Re: [PATCH] CF app: add "Returned: Needs more interest"
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2022-08-03 18:52:18 Re: pg15b2: large objects lost on upgrade