Re: Incorrect result of bitmap heap scan.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Konstantin Knizhnik <knizhnik(at)garret(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Alexander Kuzmenkov <akuzmenkov(at)timescale(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Incorrect result of bitmap heap scan.
Date: 2025-03-02 00:35:15
Message-ID: 3091523.1740875715@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie> writes:
> Is everybody in agreement about committing and back patching this fix,
> which simply disables the optimization altogether?
> I myself don't see a better way, but thought I'd ask before proceeding
> with review and commit.

If you don't see a clear path forward, then "disable" is the only
reasonable choice for the back branches. Maybe we'll find a fix
in future, but it seems unlikely that it'd be back-patchable.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Corey Huinker 2025-03-02 01:55:51 Re: Statistics Import and Export
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2025-03-02 00:32:05 Re: Incorrect result of bitmap heap scan.