| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Masahiko Sawada <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standby server |
| Date: | 2017-08-05 14:33:23 |
| Message-ID: | 30914.1501943603@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 4:14 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> If no other committer wants to take a shot at those patches, it may be
>> better to push them after the next minor release happens? I don't like
>> delaying bug fixes, but the release is close by and time flies.
> /me reads patches.
> [ assorted objections ]
Given Robert's objections, there's no way we should force these into
Monday's releases. Safer to spend whatever time is needed to get it
right.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-08-05 14:51:24 | Re: pg_stop_backup(wait_for_archive := true) on standby server |
| Previous Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-08-05 13:36:52 | Re: PostgreSQL 10 (latest beta) and older ICU |