Re: SQL/JSON: JSON_TABLE

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Erikjan Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Himanshu Upadhyaya <upadhyaya(dot)himanshu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikita Glukhov <n(dot)gluhov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Oleg Bartunov <obartunov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: SQL/JSON: JSON_TABLE
Date: 2022-04-06 16:04:35
Message-ID: 3089003.1649261075@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> I think we should, but I think here the obvious solution is to drop the
>> table when we're done with it. I'll test that.

> It does work, but Tom prefers not to have the test at all, so I'll just
> rip it out.

Perhaps moving it to some other place (test/modules/something?) would
be appropriate. But I don't think that the core regression tests,
which are currently run four or more times per buildfarm cycle,
are an appropriate place for million-row test cases.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2022-04-06 16:07:15 Re: pg14 psql broke \d datname.nspname.relname
Previous Message Andres Freund 2022-04-06 16:04:09 Re: shared-memory based stats collector - v70