Re: Underscore in positional parameters?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
Cc: Erik Wienhold <ewie(at)ewie(dot)name>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Underscore in positional parameters?
Date: 2024-07-02 14:14:48
Message-ID: 3083706.1719929688@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> writes:
> I had to revert the test case from the 0002 patch. It ended up running
> some build farm machines out of memory.

That ties into what I said upthread: why are we involving MaxAllocSize
in this at all? The maximum parameter number you can actually use in
extended queries is 65535 (because 16-bit fields), and I can't see a
good reason to permit more.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2024-07-02 14:21:58 Re: Underscore in positional parameters?
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2024-07-02 14:01:45 Re: CREATE OR REPLACE MATERIALIZED VIEW