Re: range_agg

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Subject: Re: range_agg
Date: 2020-03-13 17:06:29
Message-ID: 30803.1584119189@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Paul A Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 4:39 PM Paul A Jungwirth
> <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com> wrote:
>> Oh, my last email left out the most important part. :-) Is this
>> failure online somewhere so I can take a look at it and fix it?

Look for your patch(es) at

http://commitfest.cputube.org

Right now it's not even applying, presumably because Alvaro already
pushed some pieces, so you need to rebase. But when it was applying,
one or both of the test builds was failing.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message James Coleman 2020-03-13 17:06:33 Re: [PATCH] Incremental sort (was: PoC: Partial sort)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-03-13 16:58:25 Re: Add an optional timeout clause to isolationtester step.