From: | "Octavio Alvarez" <alvarezp(at)alvarezp(dot)ods(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Tomasz Myrta" <jasiek(at)klaster(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Lista dyskusyjna pgsql-sql" <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PERFORM] Seq scan on zero-parameters function |
Date: | 2004-02-06 17:24:52 |
Message-ID: | 3080.192.168.0.64.1076088292.squirrel@alvarezp.ods.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance pgsql-sql |
Tomasz Myrta said:
> Dnia 2004-02-06 09:43, U¿ytkownik Octavio Alvarez napisa³:
>> Thanks for the hint.
>>
>> In fact, my current_period_id() is based on time, but it should be
>> constant along the query execution. I mean, I don't want some records
>> filtered with some values and other with other values... I'll have an
>> uncongruent recordset.
>
> Well - you didn't read the chapter I noticed you, did you?
Huummm.. No... :-$
But now I did. Although the chapter makes it look as "how will the
optimizer think the function behaves", not "how the function actually
behaves".
But thanks. It's a lot clearer now. I assume that if I want to make
"timeofday" have a stable-behavior, I must enclose it in a sub-query. Am I
right?
--
Octavio Alvarez.
E-mail: alvarezp(at)alvarezp(dot)ods(dot)org(dot)
Agradezco que sus correos sean enviados siempre a esta dirección.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karl Denninger | 2004-02-06 21:36:02 | Why is query selecting sequential? |
Previous Message | Stephan Szabo | 2004-02-06 17:13:42 | Re: RE : Increase performance of a UNION query that thakes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Fisher | 2004-02-06 20:17:11 | Re: Storing a range of numbers |
Previous Message | Mona H. Kapadia | 2004-02-06 17:15:19 | unsubscribe |