From: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Instead of trying (and failing) to allow <<label>> at the end of |
Date: | 2010-03-03 06:37:30 |
Message-ID: | 3073cc9b1003022237w4ef769e6ncebe0868d08678c8@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> writes:
>> On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>>> No, I intentionally didn't back-patch that. The only benefit of the
>>> change is throwing a useful error message for questionable syntax.
>
>> then, maybe a fix in the docs of back branches?
>
> What's to fix? The documentation already makes it quite clear where
> you're supposed to put the label. I think documenting the code's
> actual behavior could only confuse people.
>
ah! yeah! sorry for the noise... it was just the need to say something
else... ;)
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | User Itagaki | 2010-03-03 08:10:12 | pgbulkload - pgbulkload: New Directory |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-03-03 06:12:16 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Instead of trying (and failing) to allow <<label>> at the end of |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Albe Laurenz | 2010-03-03 08:11:00 | Re: [GENERAL] to_timestamp() and quarters |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-03-03 06:12:16 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Instead of trying (and failing) to allow <<label>> at the end of |