Re: [PATCH] Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)
Date: 2009-12-07 04:46:59
Message-ID: 3073cc9b0912062046h51c96d48te18116b9ff3aeef5@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 11:19 PM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I just looked over the latest version of this patch and it seems to satisfy
> all the issues suggested by the initial review.  This looks like it's ready
> for a committer from a quality perspective and I'm going to mark it as such.
>

yes. i have just finished my tests and seems like the patch is working
just fine...

BTW, seems like KaiGai miss this comment in
src/backend/catalog/pg_largeobject.c when renaming the parameter
* large_object_privilege_checks is not refered here,

i still doesn't like the name but we have changed it a lot of times so
if anyone has a better idea now is when you have to speak

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2009-12-07 04:51:59 Re: pgbench: new feature allowing to launch shell commands
Previous Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-12-07 04:42:54 Re: [PATCH] Largeobject Access Controls (r2460)