| From: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: License clarification: BSD vs MIT |
| Date: | 2009-10-26 15:36:52 |
| Message-ID: | 3073cc9b0910260836g1421a09aoe1fd0d3cf2af989e@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:08 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> ISTM we should apply to OSI for approval of our licence, so we can then
> refer to it as the PostgreSQL licence.
>
IMHO and not being a lawyer, this is the only reason for anyone to
think in change our license i think...
even in the case both licenses are "roughly equivalent", because users
are afraid of any changes. if we simply change our license for no good
reason we will have a ton of questions about if PostgreSQL is being
sold just as MySQL was...
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-10-26 15:40:36 | Re: License clarification: BSD vs MIT |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-10-26 15:28:48 | Re: Parsing config files in a directory |